KUAM Attacks Senator Matt Rector To Protect Calvo Profits

After a long fought campaign by President Barack Obama, Democratic members, Senator Matt Rector, Guam and families are on the verge of becoming a part of historic healthcare reform, but like their counterparts across the Nation, at least one of Guam’s for-profit health insurance companies, Calvo’s SelectCare, is fighting back.

Calvo’s SelectCare, which profits millions of dollars from Guam’s families, has made it quite clear that they oppose National Health reform and Guam’s inclusion in it. Their corporate officers travelled to Washington DC to lobby against it, in hopes of persuading Congressional leaders from backing health reform legislation. However, Senator Matt Rector has championed the fight for quality healthcare and healthcare reform well before he was elected into office. In recent trips to Washington, DC, his purpose was to gain support for healthcare reform legislation. While there, he met with Congressmen, Senators and White house staff in efforts to ensure Guam’s families are treated like every American family and included in the New National Health plan. Unfortunately, while Guam’s families appreciate those efforts, the people that profit from status quo and from denying medical treatment, don’t.

Calvo’s Corporation, which also owns Payless Supermarkets, Mid Pac distributions, a hotel and a number of other companies employ thousands of workers. Its owners, the Calvo’s, stand to lose thousands of dollars in profits if Senator Rector’s bills pass, like: The Working Family Health Leave Act,which provides paid sick leave for private sector employees, the Democracy for All Act ,which provides 4 hrs of paid democracy leave every month, the Living Wage for Guam’s Families Act,which requires any company that receives tax breaks from or does business with GovGuam to pay their employees at least $13.40 per hour, or the Angel LG Santos Memorial Water for the People Act which puts water and sewer infrastructure on Chamorro Land trust land and makes corporate accounts and golf courses pay for it. Senator Rector says, “It’s no secret that there has been a concerted effort to discredit me, soil my image and do everything possible to stop my efforts to improve the quality of life for Guam’s working families and that includes threatening my life. Over the last couple of months I have received threatening phone calls that have gotten so persistent that last week I applied for a concealed weapon permit.”

History has shown that time and time again progressive leaders who have fought against the rich and powerful and the tyranny of corporate power have been attacked and assassinated. Martin Luther King, Mahatma Ghandi, John and Bobby Kennedy, Malcom X, Huey Long and even our very own Senator Angel Santos have all met their untimely death for standing up for Working Families.

Senator Rector continues, “Winning a better life for Guam’s Families has become my foremost mission in life and I can’t get it done if I am dead so I thought that it was important that I have the means to protect myself and the people around me. When I applied for a concealed weapon permit I had forgotten that I had a misdemeanor conviction 26 years ago.”

Somehow Calvo’s corporation’s media arm, KUAM, got their hands on confidential information before Senator Rector was even informed that the FBI report came back saying that there was a Burglary conviction in 1983, but what the report didn’t say was that it was a misdemeanor conviction which doesn’t prohibit the issuance of a gun permit.

Senator Rector says, “I’ll admit that my friends and I came home on Christmas break had a few drinks at my house and walked over to the mall behind my house and climbed on the roof. Unfortunately, there was a door open and we stupidly opened it and went in. After a couple of minutes we decided that it was a pretty stupid thing to do but once we climbed off the roof the police were already there and we were arrested. We eventually pled guilty to misdemeanor burglary got informal probation and a few hours of community service. Was it a stupid thing to do? Yes, of course! Did I lie on my application for a gun license? No I don’t believe so. It was my understanding that my record was automatically sealed if I kept my nose clean, but I have since learned that I should get the record expunged which is already in the works.”

As always Senator Rector is a champion for truth, justice and a decent standard of living for all of Guam’s families not just the wealthy few and this shameful attack full of lies and deceit will not go unnoticed by the rest of Guam’s families.

30th Guam Legislature

The 30th Guam Legislature is halfway through their term and the island nightmare of politics has begun.  Schools have closed, education has received a huge blow to their funding, people’s homes are being taken away, pay raises for only bosses were given, and new fees were put in place.  That’s right, every reason you vote a person out of office is exactly what some of these senators are doing.

November Session

Bill 95’s efforts to keep FQ Sanchez Elementary School open did not pass.  Only Frank Aguon, Judi Guthertz, Matt Rector, and Rory Respicio votes yes to keep it open.

Bill 116 authorizes the Guam Census Program to temporarily hire workers for the Decennial 2010 Census.  Only Ben Pangelinan, Matt Rector and Rory Respicio voted no. This doesn’t provide any benefits for workers as oppose to hiring them as service contracts which provides health and retirement benefits.

Bill 176 establishes additional fees for the Government of Guam to collect for Notary applications.  It was passed by a 10-5 vote.  This poses insignificant fees for the people of Guam.

Bill 177 establishes additional fees for clearances with the Attorney General’s office.  Only Ben Pangelinan and Matt Rector voted no.  This poses insignificant fees for the people of Guam as well.

Bill 181 gives a 4% pay increase for the Judges and Justices and no increases to the lower level workers.  Only Ben Pangelinan, Matt Rector, Telo Taitague and Judi Won Pat voted no.

Bill 200 gives a pay increase for the Attorney General but not for the lower level workers.  It passed with a 9-6 vote.

Bill 209 requires all persons or public officials that have authority over GovGuam contracts to comply with a financial disclosure.  All voted yes.  This will disclose of any conflict of interests.

Bill 135 authorizes the Department of Public Health and Social Services to use H2 visa fees to fund 16 public workers to conduct health inspections.  This bill passed with 11 yes votes and only Frank Blas Jr., Eddie Calvo and Ray Tenorio voting no.

Bill 147 gives more accountability with the Guam Economic Development Authority by prohibiting giving loans to those who already owe money to the Government.  This bill passed with an 11-3 vote.

Bill 175 allows private corporations control in certain functions of the Guam Power Authority and Guam Water Authority which may harm our current workers and increase rates.  Only BJ Cruz, Ben Pangelinan, Judi Guthertz, Matt Rector and Rory Respicio voted no.

Bill 191 allows all Graduates under the DOC Sanchez Scholarship Program to receive a pay increase.  All voted yes.  This rewards our workers for the higher education obtained which benefits their job.

Bill 227 gives Parole Officers hazardous pay.  This bill passed with only 1 no vote from Ben Pangelinan.  This compensates our Parole Officers for the hazardous situations that they undergo.

Bill 233 amends the Rules and Regulations on DOE school property to which will allow advertising on school property. DOE schools should remain neutral.  Only Ben Pangelinan and Matt Rector voted no.

Bill 207 allows DPW to use Federal Funds to buy property from the people of Guam and/or condemn property.  Only Ben Pangelinan and Matt Rector voted no.

Bill 229 decreases funds from the Yamashita Corp by taking away the opportunity to retain current teachers who would like to expand their knowledge and certification in education.  Unfortunately this bill passed with only BJ Cruz, Judi Guthertz, Ben Pangelinan, Matt Rector and Rory Respecio who voted no.

For a recap on the 15 Guam Senators, we have the following:

Senator Thomas C. Ada
Majority Whip
Committee on Utilities, Transportation, Public Works and Veterans Affairs

Senator Frank B. Aguon, Jr.
Committee on Economic Development, Health & Human Services, and Judiciary

Senator Frank F. Blas, Jr.

Senator Edward J.B. Calvo
Minority Leader

Senator Benjamin J.F. Cruz
Vice-Speaker
Committee on Tourism, Cultural Affairs, Youth and Public Broadcasting

Senator James V. Espaldon
Minority Whip

Senator Judith P. Guthertz, DPA
Assistant Majority Leader
Committee on the Guam Military Buildup and Homeland Security

Senator Tina R. Muna-Barnes
Legislative Secretary
Committee on Municipal Affairs, Aviation, Housing and Recreation

Senator Adolpho B. Palacios, Sr.
Committee on Public Safety, Law Enforcement, and Senior Citizens

Senator Vicente (Ben) C. Pangelinan
Committee on Appropriations, Taxation, Banking, Insurance, Retirement, and Land

Senator Matt Rector
Assistant Majority Whip
Committee on Labor, the Public Structure, Public Libraries and Technology

Senator Rory J. Respicio
Majority Leader
Committee on Rules, Natural Resources, and Federal, Foreign, & Micronesian Affairs

Senator Telo Taitague
Assistant Minority Whip

Senator Ray Tenorio
Assistant Minority Leader

Senator Judith T. Won Pat, Ed.D.
Speaker
Committee on Education

Tags: , , , ,

Why exercise doesn’t lead to weight loss

Why exercise doesn’t lead to weight loss.  I’ve been saying this for years.  It’s not about working out everyday.  It’s about the amount of calories we consume.  If we lose 3,500 calories, we lose a pound.  Likewise, if we want to put on a pound of muscle, we have to consume 3,500 calories and workout.  Fat takes up 3 times more space than muscle.  That’s because muscle is 3 times more dense than fat.  So, to lose weight gradually, consume less calories than what your body requires.  I’m sure that if you google.com/bing.com long enough, you’ll come across a calculator for that.  Working out helps burn 100-200 calories per workout.  If you consume 200 less calories a day (easily done if you switch to diet coke instead of regular) and workout, you could net 400 less calories a day.  3500/400 = 8.75 days to lose a pound or 3.4 pounds a month.  If you’re on the intense P90X workout everyday, you’ll definitely be burning more than 200 calories a day, so you’ll lose even more weight per month.  More room for fiestas!

I’m not saying that you should quit working out altogether.  Instead, you should workout and watch how much calories you consume.  Both go hand in hand for a healthy lifestyle.  Working out does increase the appetite, but be mindful of the net calorie intake.

Finally, evidence to support my statements

http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/04/phys-ed-why-doesnt-exercise-lead-to-weight-loss/

Senator Matt Rector Apologies to Senator Telo Taitague

Dear Senator Taitague:

Buenas Yan Hafa Adai!

Misunderstandings happen from time to time, it’s regrettable but it is the nature of life in general and the Democratic process in specific. It’s a shame that we had a misunderstanding and that it has become fodder for Guam’s corporate media to exploit. It has distracted from the real issues that are plaguing our island and our families; decent wages, paid sick leave, decent public education, affordable quality health care and an economy that works for everyone not just the wealthy few. For this reason, I will no longer participate in the he said she said, dirty laundry media game and this will be my final statement on the issue.

Senator, I am sorry for any perceived violation of your personal space.

If you think that I tapped you on the shoulder in an inappropriate manner, I apologize and I promise to do everything possible to give you room whenever I am in your vicinity. I hope that you accept this apology and we can move on to doing the job that the people of Guam elected both of us to do.

If we allow this to end here, I promise that I will not pursue any legal action with regards to this issue. That being said, I must be perfectly clear, I will always defend my good name. I have never violated, assaulted or lifted a hand in anger against anyone, man, woman, nor child, on Guam ever and anyone that says so will be held accountable for misrepresenting the truth.

In the future I hope that we will be able to contain our debate over ideological differences to the issue at hand. Even though I am incredibly passionate about the issues that I believe in, as I’m sure that you are as well, I hope that in the future we can both endeavor to keep our discussions at a professional level.

Thank you for your understanding and I look forward to being able to work with you in the professional manner in which the people of Guam elected us both to do.

Senseramente,
MATT RECTOR
SENATOR, I Mina’Trenta Na Liheslaturan Guåhan

After reading through the apology letter, I have to admit that Senator Matt Rector is trying to get his colleague to focus on his issues rather than simply apologizing.  “It has distracted from the real issues that are plaguing our island and our families; decent wages, paid sick leave, decent public education, affordable quality health care and an economy that works for everyone not just the wealthy few.”

Senator Telo Taitague and the rest of the Republican senators have not proposed anything so far that addresses those issues.  Come to think of it, I don’t remember if the Democrats, other than Senator Matt Rector, proposed legislation to address those issues.  Senator Tom Ada’s bill 30-223 to increase wages at the Port of Guam is a farce and doesn’t count as a good example.  It only increases the wages of the working employees by $0.06 per hour, and increments will be forever capped at $0.06 per hour, while management increases their salaries to around $300,000 for their Director.  All of Guam’s employees need a raise, not just the government employees.  I think GHURA (Guam Housing and Urban Renewal Authority) or some agency needs to levy fines against businesses that pay their employees poverty wages.  Hearing people like Monty Mesa on Mondays on K57 (waste of time) disturbs me when he talks about giving his employees minimum wage for years because the employees are slow to perform or are under-trained.

Tags: ,

JFK Starts on Monday, August 24, 2009

John F. Kennedy High School finally opens its doors to students on Monday, August 24, 2009.   The first day of class for the JFK islanders will begin with Green Day (periods 1,3,5) and the first bell will be ringing at 7:05am.  The two week delay was caused by concerns from the superintendent’s office regarding the high levels of Chlordane and the ongoing construction by Coretech on a few classrooms.  There were last minute changes made by DOE to divide classrooms, addition of sinks, and Coretech was trying their best to address the changes.

“It’s my responsibility to ensure that nothing happens to you 20 years down the line, so if there’s any indication that you might be harmed by something you can’t see right now, but may be present, that’s my responsibility,” Nerissa Underwood explained.

The flexible make-up days within GDOE’s schedule found on www.gdoe.net might be used to make up lost education time.  The 14 Points of an Adequate Education Law mandates that the Education Department must provide for 180 days of instruction.  However, the flexible make-up days are reserved for natural disasters only.  Seeing how this event is not a natural disaster, I am sure this will cost the government some money, cost the teachers their vacation, or cost the students their education time.

Interim JFK High School

In late July 2009, Guam health officials were notified that chlordane was detected in surface soils near building foundations at the Interim JFK High School at concentrations that warranted further investigation.    Surface  soil  chlordane  concentrations  ranged  from  non-detected  to  205 mg/kg.  Guam EPA noted  the chlordane at  the  Interim JFK High School was applied  in accordance with the  common  practice  at  the  time  for  its  intended  purpose  as  a  termiticide.    Based  on  the  soil concentrations,  the Guam EPA has concluded  that  the  relative  risk of chlordane at  the school  is similar  to  the  risk  from exposures at any  school or building  that was  constructed prior  to 1989.  AMEC concurs with this statement.   Exposures and risk to chlordane detected at the school would result from directly touching, eating or  inhaling soil with chlordane  in  it.   Due  to  the  length of  time between application of chlordane and the present day, chlordane is highly unlikely to be present in air.   To eliminate  the possibility of direct contact with soils and  to eliminate potential  health  risk  to  students,  a  4-foot wide  concrete walkway was constructed near building  foundations over soils with elevated  levels of chlordane.   Soil sampling conducted in August 2009 beyond the boundary of the walkway indicates that the 4-foot walkway has removed exposures to soils with higher concentrations of chlordane.  Chlordane concentrations in soils immediately beyond the walkway ranged from non-detected to 4.8 mg/kg.

What is Chlordane?
Chlordane  is a complex man-made chemical mixture  that was used as a pesticide  in  the United States  from  1948  to  1988.  It  is  a  thick  liquid  whose  color  ranges  from  colorless  to  amber, depending on its purity. It may have no smell or a mild, irritating smell.  Before  1978,  chlordane  was  also  used  as  a  pesticide  on  agricultural crops,  lawns and gardens and as a  fumigating agent. USEPA canceled the use of chlordane on food crops and phased out other above-ground uses  over  the  next  5  years.  In  1988,  when  the  USEPA  canceled chlordane’s use  for controlling  termites, all approved uses of chlordane in the United States stopped. In soil, chlordane attaches strongly to particles and is unlikely to pose a threat to groundwater.  Half of the chlordane applied to soil surface may evaporate in 2 to 3 days. Evaporation is much slower after chlordane penetrates into the soil as it is bound very tightly.

What Harmful Effects Can Chlordane Have on Us?
Most health effects in humans from chlordane exposure are on the nervous system, the digestive system, and  the  liver. Chlordane  is considered a possible human carcinogen  (Agency  for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Toxicological Profile for Chlordane).

Tags: , , , , ,

Blends Magazine Launch Party

be there, it's gonna be fun!!!

be there, it's gonna be fun!!!

Senator Rector’s youtube spots to promote Bill 180

Senator Rector is leading the innovative arena as far as marketing his public hearings are concerned.  Here are two videos from Senator Matt Rector from youtube where he encourages the public to participate at in a public hearing for Bill 180 that adjusts the Government of Guam employees’ pay by an increase of $10,880.

Tags: , , ,

Cash for Clunkers

cars

  • Your vehicle must be less than 25 years old on the trade-in date
  • Only purchase or lease of new vehicles qualify
  • Generally, trade-in vehicles must get 18 or less MPG (some very large pick-up trucks and cargo vans have different requirements)
  • Trade-in vehicles must be registered and insured continuously for the full year preceding the trade-in
  • You don’t need a voucher, dealers will apply a credit at purchase
  • Program runs through Nov 1, 2009 or when the funds are exhausted, whichever comes first.
  • The program requires the scrapping of your eligible trade-in vehicle, and that the dealer disclose to you an estimate of the scrap value of your trade-in. The scrap value, however minimal, will be in addition to the rebate, and not in place of the rebate.

gas-gauge

Q: Is Cash for Clunkers a scam?

No. The U.S. Government’s Cash for Clunkers (or CARS) Program is not a scam. It’s a legitimate program administered by the Department of Transportation. There are, however, plenty of scams popping up that are trying to take advantage of consumers looking to participate in the program. For more, see: Beware of Cash for Clunkers Scams. A better question might be, will it work? or will it be an efficient use of our tax dollars?

Q: When does the Cash for Clunkers or CARS program begin and how long does it last?

The Cars for Clunkers bill was made into law on June 25, 2009. The program was implemented on July 24, 2009. But transactions taking place between June 1, 2009 and November 1, 2009 are eligible. Note that funds for the program may run out prior to November 1, 2009.

Q: Where do I go to find the “official” government information about the CARS program?

Please visit the official Department of Transportation website at CARS.gov or call the CARS hotline at (866)-CAR-7891.

Q: Does the clunker trade-in need to have been registered and insured in your name for at least a year?

As far as I can tell, the clunker must have been registered in your name for at least one year. The CARS website says that the vehicle must have been insured for at least one year.

Q: My clunker is really old. How old can my clunker be to meet the requirements for this program?

The clunker needs to be less than 25 years old on the date you trade it in. The date the vehicle was made is located on the safety sticker found on the frame of the driver side door. Remember also that the clunker has to be in working condition. You can’t push it in.

Q: I’m currently leasing a vehicle? Does it qualify as my clunker?

No. You need to own the vehicle for it to be eligible. But you can trade-in a clunker that you own for a new car lease.

Q: Can you trade a clunker car for credit towards a new truck? And can you trade a clunker truck for credit towards a new car?

Yes. As long as the clunker and new car meet the miles per gallon (mpg) requirements and other requirements, it doesn’t matter if it is a car or a truck.

Q: What will the dealership do with my clunker once I trade it in?

The clunker cannot be re-sold. It must be destroyed. The dealer will likely sell it to a scrap yard. It’s possible some parts may be stripped from the cars. But the main body and drive chain must be destroyed.

Q: Can I get a “new to me” used car with the Cash for Clunkers program?

No. You must buy or lease (for 5 years) a brand new vehicle. Used cars are not allowed.

Q: Can I get a new 2008 vehicle?

Yes. As long as it’s new, not used, it is eligible.

Q: Can I trade in a clunker for a new motorcycle?

No. This only applied to autos.

If your question wasn’t answered above, please visit the Department of Transportation website for the program at CARS.gov.

FAQ’s for Bill 180 $10,880 Pay adjustment for Guam’s Public Servants

mattrectorheader

FAQs Bill 180

Q: Who would get the $10,880 pay increase?

A: Every classified employee of the Government of Guam that doesn’t work for an autonomous agency.

Q: Why $10,880?

A: The last pay scale adjustment was in 1989, $10,880 reflects the amount that the lowest paid Public Servant (Pay Grade A, Step 1) has lost to inflation. People in higher pay grades like teachers, Accountants, Nurses, engineers etc have lost more.

Q: Will this be a final pay scale for Public Servants?

A: No, this is a minimum stop gap just to account for wages lost to inflation. There is currently a new Hay study underway which will reset all of the wages much higher eventually.

Q: Why don’t we wait until the next Hay study is done?

A: First we can’t wait. Public Servants have been told to wait for so long they can’t make ends meet. Second, This guarantees a minimum fair wage increase. Third, after the last couple of wage studies done we have seen that the results of the study may not reflect anything more than the marching orders given to the people doing the survey.

Q: Will we need to raise taxes to pay for this or is it an unfunded mandate?

A: No on both counts. The additional revenue will be generated by increasing the wages of private sector workers by a comparable amount via Bill 111. By forcing Large corporations to pay their employees a Living Wage the Public Structure saves millions in subsidies (EITC, GHURA housing, Food Stamps, MIP etc) and generates Millions of more dollars in tax revenues.

Q: Will this cause inflation?

A: No! History proves that the wages of workers on Guam has almost zero effect on our cost of living.

Q: Won’t businesses just use this as an excuse to raise their prices any way?

A: No. Business is competitive by nature, if a business can undercut another and still make a profit it will.

Q: Will this be “Anti-Business”?

A: No. In fact it’s just the opposite. When workers earn an extra dollar they spend it in our economy where it circulates ten times so our economy will grow and local businesses will prosper. Any additional cost that they may incur as a result of pay raises will be made up by the increased volume of business.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Pastor Roy Burk Testimony Against Bill 185

July 28, 2009

Senators of the 30th Guam Legislature

Dear Senators,

My name is Roy Burk; I am the Pastor of Life in the Son Christian Fellowship Church located in Maite, Guam and I am the current President of the Guam Ministerial Association.   I am writing to oppose Bill 185.  It would be wrong to assume that my opposition of this measure is based solely upon a theological argument, but Scripture does categorize homosexuality as sin.  Although this measure avoids a direct assertion for the allowance of same-sex civil unions it does.  It is a measure unnecessary for persons of opposite gender since they are already afforded legal marriage.

It is also important to rightfully understand that measures of this type are demands for lifestyle preferences and should be separated from any notion of a civil right.  As a Guam resident of African-American descent I am sickened by such comparisons.  The science which claims that homosexuality is inborn and unchangeable has been completely rejected by the broader scientific community.  “There is no evidence whatsoever demonstrating that homosexual behavior is simply genetic or that people are born gay, and what few laypeople know is that none of the actual research claims that there is.”[1] People are equal in value and worth, but sexual choices and lifestyles are not.  Laws which recognize, favor, and promote traditional marriage do not violate the rights of people whose lifestyle preferences are denied legal approval (consider laws which forbid polygamy).  Measures of this type have more to do with conflicting worldviews than they do with issues of civil rights.

I oppose this legislation believing that any legitimization of homosexual behavior is a threat to family, and society, and disregards the transformational capabilities of the Gospel message.  The truth is:

  • The longest-lasting societies in history have all been highly moralistic.[2] These societies have not always been Christian, but they all trusted in a transcendent source for their moral authority.  Those societies that have attempted morality without religion have been the most repressive and religion itself became a target for persecution.  This pattern is pertinent to this legislation.  Canada and Sweden both passed hate-speech legislation making it a crime for churches to teach what the Bible says about homosexuality soon after approving measures legitimizing same-sex unions.   Historically where the church is silenced, oppression is normative.  Our nations’ Judeo-Christian heritage led to pluralism in worship; the elevated status of women; and affords freedoms to all members of the culture.  Consider the lack of freedom to worship or the plight of women in other nations and you will understand my rationale for introducing our nation’s religious heritage into this letter.

Harvard Professor of law Mary Ann Glendon wrote,

Religious freedom, too is at stake. As much as one may wish to live and let live, the experience in other countries reveals that once these arrangements become law, there will be no live-and-let-live policy for those who differ. Gay-marriage proponents use the language of openness, tolerance, and diversity, yet one foreseeable effect of their success will be to usher in an era of intolerance and discrimination the likes of which we have rarely seen before. [Consider the attack on Miss California who answered honestly and respectfully on her opinion of gay-marriage]  Every person and every religion that disagrees will be labeled as bigoted and openly discriminated against. The ax must fall most heavily on religious persons and groups that don’t go along. Religious institutions will be hit with lawsuits if they refuse to compromise to their principles.”[3]

  • There is empirical evidence demonstrating that the allowance of same-sex marriage within a culture harms the institution of marriage.[4]
  • Contradicting the sanitized image of committed lifelong same-sex relationships being presented by the sponsors of this legislation, researchers in one study found that only seven couples out of one-hundred-fifty-six had a totally exclusive sexual relationship and of the seven none had been together for more than five years.  In other words all of the couples studied with a relationship lasting longer than five years had incorporated some provision for sex outside of their relationships.[5]
  • 38% of homosexuals surveyed said the longest relationship they have had did not last longer than a year.[6]
  • I believe that the biggest hazard of this proposed measure is that it will dissuade persons with same-sex attraction from seeking and experiencing the liberty available through the ministries of the church.  The words used by The Apostle Paul indicate that homosexuality could be changed (Ref; 1 Corinthians 6:9-11) and there is ample evidence which demonstrates that change is both possible and permanent.  Dr. Jeffrey Satinover reported a 52% success rate in the treatment of unwanted homosexual attractions and researchers Masters and Johnson reported a 65% success rate;[7] others have achieved success rates as high as 70%.[8]

Bill 185 would serve to legitimize lifestyle preferences which are a threat to family and society, and might deter people from seeking and receiving the transformational potential available through Christian ministries.  I have and will continue to lovingly minister to people who struggle with sin of all types; but I do not support Bill 185.

Sincerely,

Roy A. Burk


[1] S. Michael Craven, Uncompromised Faith: Overcoming Our Culturalized Christianity, (Colorado Springs, Co: NAVPRESS, 2009), 118

[2] Peter Kreeft, How to Win the Culture War: A Christian Battle Plan for a Society in Crisis (Downers Grove, Il: Intervarsity, 2002), 51

[3] Mary Ann Glendon, “For Better or for Worse? The Federal marriage amendment would strike a blow for freedom,” opinion post to online editorial page, The Wall Street Journal (February 25, 2004), http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110004735

[4] S. Michael Craven, Uncompromised Faith: Overcoming Our Culturalized Christianity, (Colorado Springs, Co: NAVPRESS, 2009), 137

[5] David McWhirter and Andrew Mattison, The Male Couple: How Relationships Develop, (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984), 252-253

[6] Karla Jay and Alan Young, The Gay Report: Lesbians and Gay Men Speak Out About Sexual Experiences and Lifestyles, (New York: Summit Books, 1979), 340

[7] Joe Dallas, “Responding to Pro-Gay Theology,” LeadershipU.com, http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/dallas.html

[8] Quoted in a A. Dean Byrd, Shirley E. Cox, Jeffrey W. Robinson, “The Innate-Immutable Argument Finds No Basis in Science” (Updated February 8, 2008), National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH), http://www.narth.com/docs/innate.html

Tags: , , , , ,